#1  
Old May 15th, 2012, 02:49 PM
trato trato is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2
trato is on a distinguished road
Default VPN between FVS336G and FVS318G

Hello

Could anyone halp me?

I'm trying to stablish vpn between two sites using a FVS336G and FVS318G.

This logs are displayed and connection does not came online:

2012 May 15 19:44:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. 5ec4b08f6b6689dd:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:44:09 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. ESP ip_site2->ip_site1 _
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.0.0/24<->192.168.1.0/24_
2012 May 15 19:43:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. f00cdb522a441665:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. _
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Invalid SA protocol type: 0_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] accept a request to establish IKE-SA: ip_site2_
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 15th, 2012, 04:21 PM
trato trato is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2
trato is on a distinguished road
Default Re: VPN between FVS336G and FVS318G

I solved this problem with SA life time equal in both routers.

At this time they are connected (IPsec SA Established), but ping of onw site to other does not respond.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 16th, 2012, 01:09 PM
jmizoguchi's Avatar
jmizoguchi jmizoguchi is online now
Senior Member
NETGEAR Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 88,642
jmizoguchi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: VPN between FVS336G and FVS318G

http://forum1.netgear.com/showthread.php?t=19284
__________________
VPN Case Study (www.vpncasestudy.com)
Our Second To None VPN Related Setup Case Study
"One Stop Solution To Your Netgear VPN Connectivity"
*Visit the site for Non-VPN related Doc & Links* [Windows & Mac user/support]

Most Other Useful Docs -"General Technical Documentation", "Router Reset", "Router Setup", "Print Server Tips", "Remote Admin"
"Wireless Tips"


Forum Policy

June Mizoguchi-i....@vpncasestudy.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM.