|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a WNDR3700-100PES.
How about 100-13948-01R14?? Is this a bad revision? Sometimes my wireless drops and it looks like the wireless loses his strenght. I`m worried now when i would flash dd-wrt on it. That i will brick/destroy it because of the wireless issue. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would not flash it on it. there are still bugs they need to work out. and none are actually "bad" its just some work better than others at certain things
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
So is the revision number not on the router anywhere? Do I have to get the box out of storage?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
At least my, one of the very first (german) revision 01R10 has this number on the package only. And not on the router. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
What about "01R8"?
Good or bad? |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
My new WNDR3700 R17 which came in a blue/purple box has the Revision 4 board - no wonder there is no difference in terms of performance between the R17 and R21, which have the same board.
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you 100% positive the R17 is Revision 4? Reason I ask, is because I am still with in the 30 day window and my local BB has R21's now.
Thanks! |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just received a WNDR37AV from Newegg.com. The box is black with a blue top side. Box states "WNDR 37AV" with wireless N not draft-n. Neither the box nor router contain a revison number, i.e; 02R1 or 01R21. The router shipped with .49NA firmware which I updated to .68NA. I called support to find out my version based on the serial number but they were less than helpful. They claimed all of the routers were version 1 and that a revision number does not even exist. Any ideas if I have the latest revision with the 4 board?
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
What about "01R8"?
I ALSO have this one............Anyone? |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I dont know why they wont do it, my guess is that it has to do with the dead 2.4ghz routers out there, if failure rates are above about 2-3% then people having the ability to know that they have a router in that "zone" of production would likely see them doing a lot of RMA's and that's something that they will want to avoid.. I would welcome anyone passing this up to support if they wish to object to this being the possible case. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|