#11  
Old October 31st, 2011, 08:29 AM
Simon0 Simon0 is offline
Senior Member
NETGEAR Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 889
Simon0 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by therat View Post
Once a WNDR3700 v1 has been flashed with gargoyle firmware, is it possible to go back to the netgear firmware?
3rd party firmware will often allow you to flash anything to the router and firmware header protection is often disabled. So tftp may not be needed. Flash failure via webui is oftentimes caused by browser cache issues.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 31st, 2011, 10:43 AM
NightOwl326 NightOwl326 is offline
Member
NETGEAR User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 87
NightOwl326 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon0 View Post
The Gargoyle firmware does seem to have EXCELLENT Atheros support.
Does Gargoyle do readyshare of hard drive with current firmware?

Does it do printer sharing?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old October 31st, 2011, 12:05 PM
DodgeDeBoulet DodgeDeBoulet is offline
Member
NETGEAR User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 67
DodgeDeBoulet is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

While I know discussion of 3rd party firmwares for Netgear products has been frowned upon in this forum in the past, I'm extremely curious to hear about any experiences from those that have used Arokh's OpenWRT builds as well as Gargoyle. It appears as though the latter has solved some performance issues seen with Arokh's, but I assume all driver updates had been incorporated into OpenWRT trunk so they would be available in his builds as well.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old October 31st, 2011, 12:09 PM
Mars Mug's Avatar
Mars Mug Mars Mug is offline
Moderator
NETGEAR Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stevenage UK
Posts: 12,184
Mars Mug is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

It’s not frowned upon, but these forums cannot develop into support forums for third part firmware. For help and support with third party firmware people need to go to the relevant site, but general discussion OK. Except this discussion is taking this thread off topic.
__________________
I don't work for Netgear.

My name is Andy.

Last edited by Mars Mug; October 31st, 2011 at 12:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old October 31st, 2011, 09:57 PM
Simon0 Simon0 is offline
Senior Member
NETGEAR Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 889
Simon0 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightOwl326 View Post
Does Gargoyle do readyshare of hard drive with current firmware?

Does it do printer sharing?
Those are simply packages you can add.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old November 2nd, 2011, 04:53 PM
MiloWilson MiloWilson is offline
Junior Member
NETGEAR Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12
MiloWilson is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

A noob question. You have installed a different firmware other than Netgear firmware to the router?!? I didn't know that was possible. How do you accomplish that? Are there any different loading directions? Can you go back if there are problems?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old November 2nd, 2011, 05:07 PM
Simon0 Simon0 is offline
Senior Member
NETGEAR Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 889
Simon0 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiloWilson View Post
A noob question. You have installed a different firmware other than Netgear firmware to the router?!? I didn't know that was possible. How do you accomplish that? Are there any different loading directions? Can you go back if there are problems?
1. Yes.
2. webgui or tftp.
3. No.
4. Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old November 3rd, 2011, 01:13 PM
nToxik nToxik is offline
Junior Member
NETGEAR Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
nToxik is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gargoyle - (Split from Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?)

Considering how broken Netgear firmware is at the moment, is there any cons to use Gargoyle? Is there a list of things that are still being worked on or does everything work? How is the speed compared to netgear firmware?

I'm sure I am wrong here but I thought I read somewhere on these boards that Netgear firmware was optimized for the hardware and any other 3rd-party firmware naturally ran slower than Netgear firmware?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old November 3rd, 2011, 01:48 PM
Tank_Killer's Avatar
Tank_Killer Tank_Killer is offline
Member
NETGEAR User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 200
Tank_Killer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gargoyle - (Split from Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?)

well gargoyle doesnt have the "and everything but the kitchen sink" approach. You will not find a DLNA server (not that the verion in dlinks is super great) ect...

The only feature that I miss is port triggering
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old November 3rd, 2011, 06:29 PM
KevTech KevTech is offline
Senior Member
NETGEAR Expert
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 267
KevTech is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Gargoyle - (Split from Experience with 1.0.16.98 for V1?)

I would use Openwrt Backfire before I would use Gargoyle as there is a lot more packages you can install.

Openwrt just released RC6 version of Backfire.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:09 PM.